Revised version of Stablecoins paper

“Stablecoins: Adoption and Fragility” (Sveriges Riksbank Working Paper No. 423; This version: 10/2025)

  • Abstract: This paper presents a two-period model of stablecoin runs with endogenous consumer adoption and seller acceptance decisions. Two mechanisms justify regulatory concern about excessive stablecoin adoption: (i) a run externality, whereby broader adoption increases the flightiness of marginal stablecoin holders, raising run risk; and (ii) uninternalized network effects, which erode the transaction value of bank deposits. By endogenizing the liability structure of the stablecoin issuer and linking adoption dynamics to issuer fragility , the model yields novel testable implications. Stabilizing forces–such as conversion frictions, congestion effects, issuer revenues, and seigniorage–are shown to mitigate fragility. The model also provides theoretical foundations for regulatory interventions such as disclosure requirements and reserve oversight, while showing that capital regulation may be warranted to address moral hazard. More broadly, the paper highlights how fragility can emerge endogenously from shifts in the composition of creditors–a mechanism relevant for other financial institutions vulnerable to runs. (D83, E4, G01, G28)
End of month market capitalization of top stablecoins over the period from January 2020 to August 2025. Source: coingecko.com.

Keywords: Money, payment preferences, financial stability, financial regulation.

New version of “Bank Misconduct and Online Lending”

“Bank Misconduct and Online Lending” with Isaiah Hull (Sveriges Riksbank), Yingjie Qi (Stockholm School of Economics) and Xin Zhang (Sveriges Riksbank)

  • Abstract:

We introduce a high quality proxy for bank misconduct that is constructed from
Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB) complaint data. We employ this proxy to
measure the impact of bank misconduct on the expansion of online lending in the
United States. Using nearly complete loan and application data from the online lending
market, we demonstrate that bank misconduct is associated with a statistically and
economically signi cant increase in online lending demand at the state and county
levels. This result is robust to the inclusion of bank credit supply shocks and holds for
both broader and more narrowly-de ned bank misconduct measures. Furthermore, we
show that this e ect is strongest for lower rated borrowers and weakest in states with
high levels of generalized trust.

  • Keywords: financial development, consumer loans, bank misconduct, FinTech.